The energy transition has demonstrated economic benefits, such as job creation and long-term cost reduction, which has motivated many local actors to continue down this path. Although the opportunities for progress during the Trump administration will not directly depend on the federal government, they will be based on the decentralization of climate leadership. Despite electric mobility policies perhaps not being as ambitious, they continue to open opportunities for the development of more accessible and efficient technologies by innovative companies.
In this context, the lack of federal leadership in climate action could exacerbate inequalities, as vulnerable communities tend to be the most affected by climate impacts. However, advancements in clean and renewable energy depend not only on national policies but also on the efforts of local communities, the private sector, and international partnerships.
The decision to withdraw the United States from the Paris Agreement at the start of President Trump's term has weakened the country's leadership in the global climate fight. Despite this, certain areas, such as electric mobility, are generating interest in the current administration. The suspension of federal permits for offshore wind energy projects represents a setback in the transition to clean energy, even though this technology was gaining ground in the energy market.
Although some consider the Trump administration to have been an obstacle to climate action, others highlight that certain states, such as California, remain committed to carbon neutrality. It is crucial to maintain the momentum achieved thus far, encourage collaboration, and ensure that no one is left behind on the path to a more sustainable future. The transition to a clean and renewable energy-based economy appears to be inevitable, despite the current political challenges.
